What Is Your Readiness Gap Costing You?
Get an instant estimate based on published industry benchmarks — broken down by program type, seniority level, and team size.
How we calculated this
Salary benchmarks: Median salary figures sourced from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), 2024.
Productivity gap — Sales Onboarding (3.4 months): Based on Sales Management Association research across 100+ B2B sales organizations. Companies with structured onboarding reach full productivity in 5.7 months vs. 9.1 months without, a 3.4-month delta in quota attainment. Source: Sales Management Association.
Productivity gap — Leadership / HiPo (6.0 months): Based on Michael Watkins' research (Harvard Business Review / "The First 90 Days"), which identifies the average "break-even point" for mid-to-senior leaders at 6.2 months. Source: Harvard Business Review / Watkins.
Productivity gap — Early Career / Onboarding (2.5 months): Based on SHRM and Glassdoor onboarding research showing structured onboarding reduces ramp time by an average of 25–30%. Sources: SHRM, Glassdoor.
Productivity gap — All of the Above (4.0 months): Blended average across the three program-specific benchmarks (3.4 + 6.0 + 2.5 / 3 ≈ 4.0 months).
Replacement risk: Entry Level 50% (SHRM), Individual Contributor 80% (Gallup), Manager 150% (SHRM), Director 200% (Gallup). Early turnover rate of 15% based on SHRM's 85% healthy 90-day retention benchmark. Sources: SHRM, Gallup.
Output range: Results shown as a ±20% range to reflect variation across organizations and program maturity.
These figures represent industry benchmarks, not guarantees. Actual results vary based on program structure, role complexity, and organizational context.
Why most learning investments never reach behavior change — and what to measure instead.
Download Free →20 minutes. Bring your numbers. We'll show you how teams move from guessing to proving.
Book a 20-Min Demo →